Showing posts with label gas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gas. Show all posts

Monday, December 3, 2012

GAS Canadian Oil Sands to invest C$1.3bn in Syncrude operations next year

Canadian Oil Sands, which has the largest stake in the Syncrude Canada oil sands project in northern Alberta, expects booming US light crude production to keep on pressuring prices for the synthetic oil that Syncrude pumps out in large volumes, its CEO Marcel Coutu said on Friday.

Canadian Oil Sands, which announced a C$1.3-billion 2013 capital spending budget late Thursday, expects its product to fetch $5 a barrel less on average than the US oil benchmark, West Texas Intermediate (WTI), next year. The differential varies widely. In 2011, synthetic fetched a premium to WTI of $8.27 a barrel on average, and in 2012, it has sold for an average discount of $1.38 a barrel, according to Shorcan Energy Brokers.

Syncrude, a joint venture of international oil companies, produces light crude processed from the oil sands, which has similar characteristics to the oil produced in fast-growing volumes in the Bakken region of North Dakota using horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques.

The International Energy Agency last week singled out the Bakken as one of the main drivers of its forecast for the US to overtake Saudi Arabia and Russia as the world's top oil producer by 2017.

"Refineries are looking to accept this oil. It's easier to process. I think that's clear," Coutu told analysts. "So I think that we will continue to have a discount for light product, which ours is one of, and we will find refineries that will take our product."

The crudes compete for pipeline capacity to US Midwest refineries and surging output has spawned a major expansion of rail capacity as new pipelines to move the surging volumes are slow to get built.

In early November, Suncor Energy said rising light oil production threatened the profitability of a planned 200 000 bl/d oil sands upgrading facility called Voyageur.

Suncor is also a partner in Syncrude, which has a capacity of 350 000 bl/d. Last year, the Syncrude partners pushed back some of their large expansion plans, partly to iron out reliability issues that had led to unplanned outages.

Canadian Oil Sands has a 37% stake in the project, located north of Fort McMurray, Alberta.

About 63%, or C$836-million, of its 2013 budget will be invested in projects to replace or relocate mining infrastructure and to develop facilities to reclaim tailings, a by-product of the mining process. The rest will be spent on regular maintenance, the company said in a statement.

It will spend C$393-million on maintenance, including a planned outage of one of its upgrading units in the second half of 2013.

Canadian Oil Sands said it expects Syncrude to produce 105-million to 115-million barrels in 2013, or about 301 000 bl/d at the midpoint. That represented an increase of about 3% from estimated 2012 volumes.

Costs per barrel were expected to be C$36.67, about 3% lower than this year.

The company intends to maintain its quarterly dividend of 35 Canadian cents a share through 2013, the CEO said.

Cash flow, which gives a glimpse into the company's ability to fund development and pay out dividends, is estimated at C$1.04-billion, or C$2.16 a share, for 2013, the company said.

"Given Canadian Oil Sands' strong balance sheet, we believe the company is capable of managing the dividend while funding its major project spending over the next couple of years," National Bank Financial analyst Kyle Preston said in research note. "Following the completion of these projects, we expect the company will have a much more balanced payout profile going forward."

Shares of Canadian Oil Sands, which has a market value of C$9.91-billion, were off 13 Canadian cents at C$20.30 on the TSX on Friday. They have fallen 15% so far this year.

Syncrude's other partners are Imperial Oil, Nexen, Sinopec, JX Holdings' Mocal Energy, and Murphy Oil.

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Oil and gas drive Australia resources spend to record A$268bn

Investment in the Australian resources sector has reached an all-time high of A$268.4-billion, with liquefied natural gas (LNG), gas and petroleum project accounting for the bulk of the record investment.

LNG, oil and gas investments amount to A$195-billion, the Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics (BREE) stated in its ‘Resources and Energy Major Projects—October 2012’ report.

Federal Resources and Energy Minister Martin Ferguson welcomed the strong project pipeline, which was up 3% from the previous release in April 2012.

“To put Australia's investment in oil and gas in perspective, the total committed expenditure on these projects is comparable to the cost of the Apollo Moon Program in today's prices,” Ferguson said.

The report stated that 87 projects were in the committed category, of which 51 were minerals projects, 18 gas and petroleum projects and 18 infrastructure projects. A further 277 projects were in the planning stages.

BREE executive director and chief economist Professor Quentin Grafton said 11 mega projects, costing more than A$5-billion each, accounted for A$201-billion, or 76%, of the total committed investment in resources and energy major projects. Most of these mega investments were LNG projects located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia and Gladstone, in Queensland.

In the six months to October 2012, ten projects worth A$13.2-billion were committed to after receiving a positive final investment decision, the largest of these was for an additional LNG train at the Australia Pacific LNG plant at Gladstone.

Ferguson said that the report showed that Australia had a “solid” pipeline of potential investment in resources and energy, despite weaker commodity prices.

“In the face of lower commodity prices, the delivery of this pipeline of projects is contingent on keeping production costs down, providing access to skilled labour and increasing our productivity and efficiency.”

Grafton also noted that any substantial net increase to the dollar value of committed projects would require either cost increases to larger, existing projects and/or a new final investment decision on a large project within the coming year

Ferguson noted that the Australian government was working with the resources industry to ensure that Australia remained competitive, and continued to attract investment in one of its most valuable sectors.

Edited by: Mariaan Webb